Rosenfeld, Meters. J. (2010, April). Conference online: The rise of one’s Web sites due to the fact a personal intermediary. Presentation at Society Connection out of America Meetings, Dallas, Texas. [ Backlinks ]
Shtatfeld, R., & Barak, A great. (2009). Factors associated with introducing social relationships on the Dating sites: A view from the personal replace concept. Interpersona: A global Journal into the Personal Dating, step three, 19-37. [ Links ]
Skopek, J., Schulz, F., & Blossfeld, H-P. (2010). Whom contacts which? Academic homophily into the on the web companion choice. Eu Sociological Review. [ Website links ]
Sprecher, S. (1998a). Insiders’ point of views with the reasons for having appeal so you can a virtually most other. Social Psychology Every quarter, 61, 287-three hundred. [ Website links ]
Sprecher, S. (1998b). Exactly what enjoys married partners interested in one another? 100 % free Query inside the Innovative Sociology, 26, 193-2 hundred. [ Website links ]
Sprecher, S., & Duck, S. (1994). Sweet-talk: The significance of recognized interaction to possess close and you will friendship appeal sense throughout a rating-knowledgeable about big date. Identification and Personal Psychology Bulletin, 20, 391400. [ Links ]
Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (1992). Brand new determine away from parents and you may family members on quality and you can balance regarding intimate dating: An effective around three-revolution longitudinal study. Record off ily, 54, 888-900. [ Website links ]
Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (2000). Personal partners’ thinking off social networking attributes to your passage through of some time and relationships transitions. [ Website links ]
Sprecher, S., Felmlee, D., Orbuch, T. L., & Willetts, M. C. (2002). Social networking sites and change when you look at the individual dating. For the Good. Vangelisti, H. Reis, & M. A. Fitzpatrick (Eds.), Balance and change in the Relationships (pp. 257-284). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. [ Website links ]
Sprecher, S., & Regan, P. C. (2002). Preference some things (in some somebody) over other people: Companion preferences from inside the close relationship and you will friendships. Journal of Personal and personal Relationship, 19, 463-481. [ Hyperlinks ]
Individual Matchmaking, eight, 325-340
Sprecher, S., Schwartz, P., Harvey, J., & Hatfield, Elizabeth. (2008). From enda ukrainsk kvinna inside the S. Sprecher, A good. Wenzel, & J. Harvey (Eds.), Manual away from relationship initiation (pp. 249-265). Nyc: Therapy Force/Taylor & Francis. [ Website links ]
Straaten, We., Engles, Roentgen. C. Meters. Elizabeth., Finkenauer, C., & The netherlands, Roentgen. W. (2009). Meeting your own meets: Exactly how appeal similarity affects method decisions inside combined-sex dyads. Identification and Social Mindset Bulletin, thirty five, 685-697. [ Website links ]
Sunnafrank, M., & Miller, Grams. R. (1981). The new part out of 1st conversations within the deciding interest in order to similar and you can dissimilar visitors. Individual Communication Search, 8, 16-twenty-five. [ Website links ]
Sunnafrank, M., & Ramirez, Good. (2004). At first: Chronic relational results of get-acquainted discussions. Record from Societal and private Matchmaking, 21, 361-379. [ Hyperlinks ]
Tenny, Elizabeth. R., Turkheimer, Elizabeth., & Oltmanns, T. F. (2009). Becoming enjoyed is over which have an excellent character: The fresh character off matching. Log out of Lookup in the Identity, 43, 479-585. [ Hyperlinks ]
Vangelisti, A good. L., & Perlman, D. (Eds.) (2006). The newest Cambridge handbook away from personal matchmaking. Cambridge College Drive. [ Links ]
Thebusinessoflove: Relationship initiation within Websites dating attributes
Walster, Grams.,W., Hatfield, Elizabeth., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D., & Rottman, L. (1966). Requirement for real elegance from inside the dating choices. Record regarding Identification and you can Public Mindset, 4, 508-516. [ Links ]
Watson, D., Klohnen, Elizabeth. C., Casillas, A good., Simms, E N., Haig, J., & Berry, D. S. (2004). Meets producers and you can price breakers: Analyses away from assortative mating for the newlywed couples. Record from Identity, 72, 1029-1068. [ Website links ]
Whisman, Meters. A., Coastline, S. Roentgen. H., & Snyder, D. K. (2008). Is actually relationship discord taxonic and will taxonic condition be reviewed reliably? Is a result of a national, user attempt of married couples. Journal off Asking and you can Logical Therapy, 76, 745-755. [ Backlinks ]
Recent Comments